Micron Document
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html class="client-nojs vector-feature-night-mode-disabled vector-feature-language-in-header-enabled vector-feature-language-in-main-page-header-disabled vector-feature-page-tools-pinned-disabled vector-feature-toc-pinned-clientpref-1 vector-feature-main-menu-pinned-disabled vector-feature-limited-width-clientpref-1 vector-feature-limited-width-content-enabled vector-feature-custom-font-size-clientpref-1 vector-feature-appearance-pinned-clientpref-1 vector-sticky-header-enabled" lang="en" dir="ltr"><head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Writing process</title>
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<link rel="canonical" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Writing_process"> <link href="./mw/ext.cite.styles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<link href="./mw/skins.vector.icons.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<link href="./mw/skins.vector.search.codex.styles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<link href="./mw/skins.vector.styles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<link href="./mw/user.styles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<meta name="ResourceLoaderDynamicStyles" content="">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="./mw/site.styles.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="./mw/noscript.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="./footer.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="./vector-2022.css">
</head>
<body class="skin--responsive skin-vector skin-vector-search-vue mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Writing_process rootpage-Writing_process skin-vector-2022 action-view">
<div class="mw-page-container">
<div class="mw-page-container-inner">
<div class="mw-content-container">
<main id="content" class="mw-body">
<header class="mw-body-header vector-page-titlebar">
<h1 id="firstHeading" class="firstHeading mw-first-heading">
<span id="openzim-page-title" class="mw-page-title-main"><span class="mw-page-title-main">Writing process</span></span>
</h1>
</header>
<a id="top"></a>
<div id="bodyContent" class="vector-body ve-init-mw-desktopArticleTarget-targetContainer" aria-labelledby="firstHeading" data-mw-ve-target-container="">
<div id="mw-content-text" class="mw-body-content mw-content-ltr" lang="en" dir="ltr"><div class="mw-content-ltr mw-parser-output" lang="en" dir="ltr">
<p>A <b>writing process</b> is a set of mental and physical steps that someone takes to create any type of text. Almost always, these activities require inscription equipment, either digital or physical: chisels, pencils, brushes, chalk, dyes, keyboards, touchscreens, etc.; each of these tools has unique <a href="Affordance" title="Affordance">affordances</a> that influence writers' workflows.<sup id="cite_ref-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-1"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>1<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Writing processes are very individualized and task-specific; they frequently incorporate activities such as talking, drawing, reading, browsing, and other activities that are not typically associated with writing.<sup id="cite_ref-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-2"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>2<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p>
<meta property="mw:PageProp/toc">
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="Historical_and_contemporary_perspectives">Historical and contemporary perspectives</h2></div>
<p>In 1972, <a href="Donald_Murray_(writer)" title="Donald Murray (writer)">Donald M. Murray</a> published a brief manifesto titled "Teach Writing as a Process Not Product",<sup id="cite_ref-3" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-3"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>3<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> in which he argued that English teachers' conventional training in literary criticism caused them to hold students' work to unhelpful standards of highly polished "finished writing".<sup id="cite_ref-:2_4-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:2-4"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>4<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Teachers, he explained, ought to focus less on correcting students' written products and focus more on involving students in "discovery through language", which Murray believed for "most writers most of the time" involved a process: i.e., stages of "pre-writing, writing and rewriting".<sup id="cite_ref-:2_4-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:2-4"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>4<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Though Murray was not alone in advocating process-based instruction, this manifesto is regarded<sup id="cite_ref-5" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-5"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>5<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> as a landmark vocalization of the differences between process and product orientations in the teaching of writing. Donald Murray mentioned that writing is to be considered as a process, not a product. In other words, he viewed getting the writers to work their way in order to discover new things rather than reach an end. He viewed writing as a journey of revision and development by which one discovers insights and develops thinking. Within a decade, Maxine Hairston was to observe that the teaching of writing had undergone a transformation in moving from a focus on written products to writing processes.<sup id="cite_ref-6" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-6"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>6<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>These categories were theorized more fully in subsequent scholarship. For example, pre-writing was defined by Project English experimental researcher D. Gordon Rohman as the "sort of 'thinking' [that] precedes writing" and the "activity of mind which <i>brings forth</i> and develops ideas, plans, designs".<sup id="cite_ref-:1_7-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:1-7"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> According to Rohman, writing begins "at the point where the 'writing idea' is ready for the words and the page".<sup id="cite_ref-:1_7-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:1-7"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Even today, much "process-based" teaching has continued to broadly conceptualize writing processes along these three phases.<sup id="cite_ref-8" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-8"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>8<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Some have linked this three-stage process to the <a href="Rhetoric#Canons" title="Rhetoric">five canons of rhetoric</a>: pre-writing to <a href="Inventio" title="Inventio">invention</a> and <a href="Dispositio" title="Dispositio">arrangement</a>, writing to <a href="Elocutio" title="Elocutio">style</a>, revising to <a href="Pronuntiatio" title="Pronuntiatio">delivery</a> and sometimes <a href="Memoria" title="Memoria">memory</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-9" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-9"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>9<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>While contemporary research on writing processes still accepts that some kind of process is necessarily involved in producing any written text, it now collectively endorses "the fundamental idea that no codifiable or generalizable writing process exists or could exist".<sup id="cite_ref-10" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-10"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>10<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> In this view, "writing processes are historically dynamic – not psychic states, cognitive routines, or neutral social relationships".<sup id="cite_ref-11" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-11"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>11<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-12" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-12"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>12<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> In terms of "pre-writing" for instance, writing processes often begin long before any visible documentable work or easily categorizable steps are observable.<sup id="cite_ref-13" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-13"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>13<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> From the contemporary perspective of <a href="Composition_studies" title="Composition studies">composition studies</a>, it is thus inaccurate to assume that any authentic writing process (i.e., one not contrived as part of a school assignment or laboratory setting) necessarily involves a linear sequence of "stages".<sup id="cite_ref-14" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-14"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>14<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Rather different kinds of activities emerge as overlapping parts of a complex whole or parts of a repeating process that can be repeated multiple times throughout anyone's process of composing a particular document. For example, writers routinely discover that editorial changes trigger brainstorming and a change of purpose; that drafting is temporarily interrupted to correct a misspelling; or that the boundary between pre-writing and drafting is less than obvious.<sup id="cite_ref-15" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-15"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>15<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="Approaches_to_process">Approaches to process</h2></div>
<p>The writing process has been described by <a href="Composition_studies" title="Composition studies">composition scholars</a> in a variety of ways with attention to "developmental, expressive, and social" elements.<sup id="cite_ref-16" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-16"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>16<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Cognitive_process_theory_of_writing_(Flower–Hayes_model)">Cognitive process theory of writing (Flower–Hayes model)</h3></div>
<style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1236090951">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */


.mw-parser-output .hatnote{font-style:italic}.mw-parser-output div.hatnote{padding-left:1.6em;margin-bottom:0.5em}.mw-parser-output .hatnote i{font-style:normal}.mw-parser-output .hatnote+link+.hatnote{margin-top:-0.5em}@media print{body.ns-0 .mw-parser-output .hatnote{display:none!important}}


/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style><div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">See also: <a href="Cognitive_and_linguistic_theories_of_composition" title="Cognitive and linguistic theories of composition">Cognitive and linguistic theories of composition</a></div>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading4"><h4 id="Overview_of_cognitive_model">Overview of cognitive model</h4></div>
<p><a href="Linda_Flower" title="Linda Flower">Linda Flower</a> (a composition theorist known in the field of cognitive rhetoric) and John R. Hayes extended Bitzer's rhetorical situation and developed a set of <a href="Heuristic" title="Heuristic">heuristics</a> that framed the writing process as a series of rhetorical problems to be solved. The heuristics focus on the generation and the structuring of ideas. Writers should choose goals with built-in guidelines that lead their content into certain directions. While generating ideas, four viable techniques come to play. These are: to write ideas without editing or filtering, to play out scenarios discussing the topic, to generate analogies, and to rest on ideas. When a writer is looking to push their ideas they should try to find cue words to the complex ideas together, to teach the ideas to another person, to tree ideas into classifications of organization, and to read their own writing as if they'd never seen it before. The last tool is to write for a specific audience by finding common ground with them.<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes1977_17-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes1977-17"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>17<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>Flower and Hayes further developed the cognitive model in "The Cognition of Discovery" by observing writers in order to learn how they generate meaning. They outlined the rhetorical problem as a list of what a writer may address or consider. In doing so, they created a model for the rhetorical problem that can be split up into two main categories: The rhetorical situation and the writer's own goals. The rhetorical situation is what motivates a writer to create ideas. The writer's own goals are instrumental to how ideas are formed. The rhetorical situation is further split into the purpose of the writing, and who will be reading it. The writer's own goals are split into how the reader is affected, the persona the writer uses, the meaning the writer can create, and implementation of writing conventions.<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes1980_18-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes1980-18"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>18<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>They came to three results from their study, which suggests that good writers envelop the three following characteristics when solving their rhetorical problems:
</p>
<ol><li>Good writers respond to all of the rhetorical problems.</li>
<li>Good writers build their problem representation by creating a particularly rich network of goals for affecting a reader; and</li>
<li>Good writers represent the problem not only in more breadth but in more depth.<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes1980_18-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes1980-18"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>18<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup></li></ol>
<p>Flower and Hayes suggest that composition instructors need to consider showing students how "to explore and define their own problems, even within the constraints of an assignment".<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes198030_19-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes198030-19"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>19<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> They believe that "writers discover what they want to do by insistently, energetically exploring the entire problem before them and building for themselves a unique image of the problem they want to solve."
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Historical_approaches_to_composition_and_process">Historical approaches to composition and process</h3></div>
<p>A historical response to process is concerned primarily with the manner in which writing has been shaped and governed by historical and social forces. These forces are dynamic and contextual, and therefore render any static iteration of process unlikely.
</p><p>Notable scholars that have conducted this type of inquiry include media theorists such as <a href="Marshall_McLuhan" title="Marshall McLuhan">Marshall McLuhan</a>, <a href="Walter_Ong" class="mw-redirect" title="Walter Ong">Walter Ong</a>, <a href="Gregory_Ulmer" title="Gregory Ulmer">Gregory Ulmer</a>, and Cynthia Selfe. Much of McLuhan's work, for example, centered around the impact of written language on oral cultures, degrees to which various media are accessible and interactive, and the ways in which electronic media determine communication patterns. His evaluation of technology as a shaper of human societies and psyches indicates a strong connection between historical forces and literacy practices.
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading4"><h4 id="Criticism_of_cognitive_model">Criticism of cognitive model</h4></div>
<p><a href="Patricia_Bizzell" title="Patricia Bizzell">Patricia Bizzell</a> (a professor with a Ph.D in English and former President of <a href="Rhetoric_Society_of_America" title="Rhetoric Society of America">Rhetoric Society of America</a>) argues that even though educators may have an understanding of "how" the writing process occurs, educators should not assume that this knowledge can answer the question "about 'why' the writer makes certain choices in certain situations", since writing is always situated within a discourse community.<sup id="cite_ref-:0_20-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:0-20"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>20<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> She discusses how the Flower and Hayes model relies on what is called the process of "translating ideas into visible language".<sup id="cite_ref-:0_20-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:0-20"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>20<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> This process occurs when students "treat written English as a set of containers into which we pour meaning".<sup id="cite_ref-:0_20-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:0-20"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>20<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Bizzell contends that this process "remains the emptiest box" in the cognitive process model, since it de-contextualizes the original context of the written text, negating the original.<sup id="cite_ref-:0_20-3" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:0-20"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>20<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> She argues, "Writing does not so much contribute to thinking as provide an occasion for thinking."<sup id="cite_ref-:0_20-4" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:0-20"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>20<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Social_model_of_writing_process">Social model of writing process</h3></div>
<p>"The aim of collaborative learning helps students to find more control in their learning situation. <sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTETrimbur2009_21-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTETrimbur2009-21"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>21<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>The social model of writing relies on the relationship between the writers and readers for the purpose of creating meaning. "Writers seldom write exactly what they mean and readers seldom interpret a writer's words exactly as the writer intended."<sup id="cite_ref-22" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-22"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>22<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>Even grammar has a social turn in writing: "It may be that to fully account for the contempt that some errors of usage arouse, we will have to understand better than we do the relationship between language, order, and those deep psychic forces that perceived linguistic violations seem to arouse in otherwise amiable people".<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEWilliams2009415_23-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEWilliams2009415-23"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>23<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> So one cannot simply say a thing is right or wrong. There is a difference of degrees attributed to social forces.<sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEWilliams2009_24-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEWilliams2009-24"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>24<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Expressivist_process_theory_of_writing">Expressivist process theory of writing</h3></div>
<p>According to the expressivist theory, the process of writing is centered on the writer's transformation. This involves the writer changing in the sense that voice and identity are established and the writer has a sense of his or her self. In expressivist pedagogy, writing is a process used to create meaning. An author’s sense of self is emphasized for bringing social change.<sup id="cite_ref-25" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-25"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>25<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> This theory became popular in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
</p><p>Several scholars have noted that the expressivist process is incredibly valuable when it comes to writer’s forming their own identities within writing, Michele Zugnoni and Anne Harrington in particular. Zugnoni<sup id="cite_ref-:02_26-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:02-26"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>26<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> discusses the ways in which including self-reflection and self-expression within writing is incredibly helpful in allowing first-generation students to build a sense of individuality and purpose.<sup id="cite_ref-:02_26-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:02-26"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>26<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Zugnoni had female, first-generation students use self-reflection in writing, allowing for this group of students to create a sense of individuality from writing freely. In the book “Writing With Elbow,” Herrington’s chapter, titled “Gone Fishin’: Rendering and the Uses of Personal Experience in Writing,”<sup id="cite_ref-:03_27-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:03-27"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>27<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> states that the exclusion of personal experience in an academic writing assignment disregards the value of a writer’s experiences.<sup id="cite_ref-:03_27-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:03-27"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>27<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>Expressivist process theory and academic writing complement one another,<sup id="cite_ref-Michaud_28-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Michaud-28"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>28<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> that academic inquiry focuses on discovery wherein expressivism is the discovery and analysis of your personal experiences. It is discussed that the act of writing about one’s personal experience not only helps to make sense of those experiences but allows them to build their voice, Bruce Ballenger stating his own students had told him that writing had been put into a new light when allowed to express their personal experiences.<sup id="cite_ref-Michaud_28-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Michaud-28"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>28<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>According to Richard Fulkerson's article "Four Philosophies of Composition", the focus of expressivism is for writers to have "... an interesting, credible, honest, and personal voice". Moreover, proponents of the expressivist process view this theory as a way for students to become fulfilled and healthy both emotionally and mentally. Those who teach this process often focus on journaling and other classroom activities to focus on student self-discovery and at times, low-stakes writing. Prominent figures in the field include John Dixon, Ken Macrorie, Lou Kelly, Donald C. Stewart and <a href="Peter_Elbow" title="Peter Elbow">Peter Elbow</a>.
</p><p>Expressivist theory in writing goes against the academic side of writing by valuing individualism over structure.<sup id="cite_ref-:3_29-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:3-29"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>29<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Personal voice and creative exploration is seen as a better way for student writers to write in academic settings.<sup id="cite_ref-:3_29-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:3-29"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>29<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>Writers often use freewriting as a form of expressivism.<sup id="cite_ref-:4_30-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:4-30"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>30<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Freewriting is seen as a way to allow creativity in one's writing, allowing the writer to include personal and academic ideas into each piece.<sup id="cite_ref-:4_30-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:4-30"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>30<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Expressivism allows people to let their inner thoughts roam free which is a precursor to brainstorming and organizing thoughts.<sup id="cite_ref-:4_30-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:4-30"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>30<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Many writers also use a tool called voice.<sup id="cite_ref-:5_31-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:5-31"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>31<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> It is used to give character to writing. It induces personal experience and emotion and introduces personality.<sup id="cite_ref-:5_31-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:5-31"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>31<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>Expressivism in the pedagogical world allows for themes of Being (self-concept), Belonging (community), and Becoming (growth).<sup id="cite_ref-:6_32-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:6-32"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>32<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> This leads to something called the creative identity which is viewed as something that continues to change over time. Memoirs can aid in the process of identity exploration and self reflection.<sup id="cite_ref-:6_32-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:6-32"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>32<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> By applying self reflection in writing, writers are able to understand the concept of critical expressivism which is an ideology explored by Scott Wagar.<sup id="cite_ref-:7_33-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:7-33"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>33<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Critical Expressivism highlights how using empathy and connection promotes connecting personal experiences with others’ concerns.<sup id="cite_ref-:7_33-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:7-33"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>33<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Wagar emphasizes that this level of self expression in writing can help build community and individual growth.<sup id="cite_ref-:7_33-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:7-33"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>33<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Autistic_autobiographies">Autistic autobiographies</h3></div>
<p>As appealing as document sharing may be for students with <a href="Autism" title="Autism">autism</a> in particular,<sup id="cite_ref-Rose,_Irene_2008_34-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Rose,_Irene_2008-34"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>34<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> being able to contextualize one's life story in the context of their disability may prove the most powerful expression of the overall writing process. Rose illustrates<sup id="cite_ref-Rose,_Irene_2008_34-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Rose,_Irene_2008-34"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>34<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> that creating narrative identity in a conventional sense is quite difficult for autistic students because of their challenges with interpersonal communication. The narratives of autistic students can sometimes be troubling to non-autistic peers with whom they share their work, as Rose notes in quoting autistic autobiographer Dawn Price-Hughes: "Sometimes reaching out and communicating isn't easy–it can bring sadness and regret. Some of my family and friends, after reading the manuscript for this book, were deeply saddened to learn how I experienced my world."
</p><p>Rose points to the well-known work of <a href="Temple_Grandin" title="Temple Grandin">Temple Grandin</a> and <a href="Donna_Williams" title="Donna Williams">Donna Williams</a> as examples of autistic autobiographies and analogizes toward the usefulness of women's autobiographies championed by Susan Stanford Friedman to show women's inter-connectivity, suggesting the same can be learned through autistic autobiographies. She writes that such works can minimize the "pathologization (the treatment of a health or behaviour condition as if it were a medical condition) of difference" which can easily occur between autistic students. Also, peers without autism can be broken down by such autobiographies. As Rose directly says, "I argue here that awareness of the relationality of autistic life writing, and the recognition of its corollary status as testimonio and attention to the material relations of the production of these texts is particularly useful in assessing their social significance."
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="Editing">Editing</h2></div>
<div role="note" class="hatnote navigation-not-searchable">Main article: <a href="Editing" title="Editing">Editing</a></div>

<p>Editing operates on several levels. The lowest level, often called line editing, is the stage in the writing process where the writer makes changes in the text to correct errors—such as spelling, subject/verb agreement, verb tense consistency, point of view consistency, mechanical errors, word choice, and word usage (there, their or they're)<sup id="cite_ref-Hacker_35-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Hacker-35"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>35<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>—and fine-tune his or her style. Having revised the draft for content, the writer's task is now to make changes that will improve the communication with the reader. Depending on the genre, the writer may choose to adhere to the conventions of <a href="Standard_English" title="Standard English">Standard English</a>. These conventions are still being developed and the rulings on controversial issues may vary depending on the source. For example, <a href="William_Strunk_Jr." title="William Strunk Jr.">Strunk</a> and <a href="E._B._White" title="E. B. White">White</a>'s <i><a href="Elements_of_Style" class="mw-redirect" title="Elements of Style">Elements of Style</a></i>, first published in 1918, is considered by some<sup id="cite_ref-36" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-36"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>36<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> to be an authority on stylistic conventions but has been derided by linguist <a href="Geoffrey_K._Pullum" title="Geoffrey K. Pullum">Geoffrey K. Pullum</a> as "stupid".<sup id="cite_ref-37" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-37"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>37<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-38" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-38"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>38<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> An electronic resource is the <a href="Purdue_Online_Writing_Lab" class="mw-redirect" title="Purdue Online Writing Lab">Purdue Online Writing Lab</a> (OWL), where writers may search a specific issue to find an explanation of grammatical and mechanical conventions.<sup id="cite_ref-39" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-39"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>39<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="See_also">See also</h2></div>
<ul><li><a href="Argument_map" title="Argument map">Argument mapping</a></li>
<li><a href="Composition_(language)" title="Composition (language)">Composition (language)</a></li>
<li><a href="Style_guide" title="Style guide">Style guide</a></li>
<li><a href="Writer's_block" title="Writer's block">Writer's block</a></li>
<li><a href="Writing_style" title="Writing style">Writing style</a></li></ul>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="References">References</h2></div>
<style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1239543626">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */


.mw-parser-output .reflist{margin-bottom:0.5em;list-style-type:decimal}@media screen{.mw-parser-output .reflist{font-size:90%}}.mw-parser-output .reflist .references{font-size:100%;margin-bottom:0;list-style-type:inherit}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns-2{column-width:30em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns-3{column-width:25em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns{margin-top:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns ol{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns li{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .reflist-upper-alpha{list-style-type:upper-alpha}.mw-parser-output .reflist-upper-roman{list-style-type:upper-roman}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-alpha{list-style-type:lower-alpha}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-greek{list-style-type:lower-greek}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-roman{list-style-type:lower-roman}


/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style><div class="reflist">
<div class="mw-references-wrap mw-references-columns"><ol class="references">
<li id="cite_note-1"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-1">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Haas, Christina (1996). Writing Technology: Studies on the Materiality of Literacy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Mahwah, NJ.</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-2"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-2">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1238218222">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */


.mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit;word-wrap:break-word}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"\"""\"""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .citation:target{background-color:rgba(0,127,255,0.133)}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-free.id-lock-free a{background:url("./mw/Lock-green.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-limited.id-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .id-lock-registration.id-lock-registration a{background:url("./mw/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-subscription.id-lock-subscription a{background:url("./mw/Lock-red-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:url("./mw/Wikisource-logo.svg")right 0.1em center/12px no-repeat}body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-free a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-limited a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-registration a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-subscription a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background-size:contain;padding:0 1em 0 0}.mw-parser-output .cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:none;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;color:var(--color-error,#d33)}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{color:var(--color-error,#d33)}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#085;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right{padding-right:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .citation .mw-selflink{font-weight:inherit}@media screen{.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{color:#18911f}}@media screen and (prefers-color-scheme:dark){html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{color:#18911f}}


/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style><cite id="CITEREFClayson2018" class="citation journal cs1">Clayson, Ashley (2018). "Distributed Cognition and Embodiment in Text Planning: A Situated Study of Collaborative Writing in the Workplace". <i>Written Communication</i>. <b>35</b> (2): <span class="nowrap">155–</span>181. <a href="Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741088317753348">10.1177/0741088317753348</a>. <a href="S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a>&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:148905682">148905682</a>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-3"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-3">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20241130234244/https://mwover.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/murray-teach-writing-as-a-process-not-product.pdf">"Teach Writing as a Process Not Product"</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>. Archived from <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://mwover.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/murray-teach-writing-as-a-process-not-product.pdf">the original</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span> on 2024-11-30.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-:2-4"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-:2_4-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:2_4-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text">Donald M. Murray, "Teach Writing as a Process Not Product" <i>The Leaflet</i> (November 1972), rpt. in <i>Cross-Talk in Comp Theory</i>, 2nd ed., ed. Victor Villanueva, Urbana: NCTE, 2003.</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-5"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-5">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Anson, Chris. "Process Pedagogy and Its Legacy" (2014). Tate, Gary; Hessler, Brooke; Rupiper-Taggart, Amy; Schick, Kurt (eds.). <i>A Guide to Composition Pedagogies</i> (2nd ed.). Oxford UP. pp. 212–230 [216]. <a href="ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a>&nbsp;<bdi>9780199922161</bdi>.</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-6"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-6">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Maxine Hairston, "The Winds of Change: Thomas Kuhn and the Revolution in the Teaching of Writing" <i>CCC</i> 33 (1982), pp. 76–88, rpt. in <i>The Norton Book of Composition Studies</i>, ed. Susan Miller, New York: Norton, 2009</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-:1-7"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-:1_7-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:1_7-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFRohman1965" class="citation journal cs1">Rohman, D. Gordon (1965). "Pre-Writing the Stage of Discovery in the Writing Process". <i>College Composition and Communication</i>. <b>16</b> (2): <span class="nowrap">106–</span>112. <a href="Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.2307%2F354885">10.2307/354885</a>. <a href="ISSN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISSN (identifier)">ISSN</a>&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://search.worldcat.org/issn/0010-096X">0010-096X</a>. <a href="JSTOR_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="JSTOR (identifier)">JSTOR</a>&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/354885">354885</a>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-8"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-8">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Donahue, Christiane and Theresa Lillis. (2014). "Models of Writing and Text Production". In <i>Handbook of Writing and Text Production,</i> Eva-Marie Jakobs &amp; Daniel Perrin, Eds. De Gruyter. Mouton: 55–78 [60].</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-9"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-9">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://walton.uark.edu/business-communication-lab/Resources/downloads/The_Five_Canons_of_Rhetoric.pdf">"The Five Canons of Rhetoric"</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>. <i>University of Arkansas</i>. Sam Walton College of Business<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">15 March</span> 2020</span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-10"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-10">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Kent, Thomas (1999). "Introduction". <i>Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing-Process Paradigm.</i> Thomas Kent, ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1–6 [1].</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-11"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-11">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Faigley, Lester. (1986) "Competing Theories of Process: A Critique and a Proposal". <i>College English 48</i>.6 527–542 [537].</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-12"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-12">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFStotsky1990" class="citation journal cs1">Stotsky, Sandra (1990). ""On Planning and Writing Plans -- Or Beware of Borrowed Theories!"". <i>College Composition and Communication</i>. <b>41</b> (1): <span class="nowrap">37–</span>57. <a href="Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.2307%2F357882">10.2307/357882</a>. <a href="JSTOR_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="JSTOR (identifier)">JSTOR</a>&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/357882">357882</a>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-13"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-13">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFReither1985" class="citation journal cs1">Reither, James A. (1985). "Writing and Knowing: Toward Redefining the Writing Process". <i>College English</i>. <b>47</b> (6): <span class="nowrap">620–</span>628. <a href="Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.2307%2F377164">10.2307/377164</a>. <a href="JSTOR_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="JSTOR (identifier)">JSTOR</a>&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/377164">377164</a>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-14"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-14">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFPrior1998" class="citation book cs1">Prior, Paul A. (1998). <i>Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy</i>. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge. <a href="ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a>&nbsp;<bdi>0-8058-2296-8</bdi>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-15"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-15">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFBeaufortIñesta2014" class="citation book cs1">Beaufort, Anne; Iñesta, Anna (2014). Jakobs, Eva-Maria; Perrin, Daniel (eds.). <i>Handbook of writing and text production</i>. Handbooks of Applied Linguistics. Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. pp.&nbsp;<span class="nowrap">141–</span>158. <a href="ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a>&nbsp;<bdi>978-3-11-022063-6</bdi>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-16"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-16">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Sperling, Melanie. (1998). "Process Theory of Writing". In <i>Theorizing Composition: A Critical Sourcebook of Theory and Scholarship in Contemporary Composition Studies.</i>Mary Lynch Kennedy, ed. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press: 243–249 [247].</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes1977-17"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes1977_17-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFFlowerHayes1977">Flower &amp; Hayes 1977</a>.</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes1980-18"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes1980_18-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes1980_18-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFFlowerHayes1980">Flower &amp; Hayes 1980</a>.</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes198030-19"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEFlowerHayes198030_19-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFFlowerHayes1980">Flower &amp; Hayes 1980</a>, p.&nbsp;30.</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-:0-20"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-:0_20-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:0_20-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:0_20-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:0_20-3"><sup><i><b>d</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:0_20-4"><sup><i><b>e</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFBizzell1982" class="citation journal cs1">Bizzell, Patricia (1982). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED474209.pdf#page=393">"Cognition, Convention, and Certainty: What We Need to Know About Writing"</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>. <i>Pre/Text</i>. <b>3</b> (3): <span class="nowrap">213–</span>243.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-FOOTNOTETrimbur2009-21"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTETrimbur2009_21-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFTrimbur2009">Trimbur 2009</a>.</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-22"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-22">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://writing.colostate.edu/">"Writing@CSU"</a>. <i>writing.colostate.edu</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2021-04-14</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-FOOTNOTEWilliams2009415-23"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEWilliams2009415_23-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFWilliams2009">Williams 2009</a>, p.&nbsp;415.</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-FOOTNOTEWilliams2009-24"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEWilliams2009_24-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="#CITEREFWilliams2009">Williams 2009</a>.</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-25"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-25">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFPola2007" class="citation web cs1">Pola, M. (2007). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Expressivist-Pedagogy-in-the-High-School-English-A-Pola/6140493c543df07eb0a5711d30da0fe853956e42">"Expressivist Pedagogy in the High School English Classroom: A Handbook for Curricular Integration"</a>. <a href="S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a>&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:199764261">199764261</a>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-:02-26"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-:02_26-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:02_26-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFZugnoni2019" class="citation web cs1">Zugnoni, Michele (2019). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.proquest.com/docview/2321064595">"Encouraging Empowerment Through Expression: Creation of a Self-Reflective Writing Group for First-Generation College Students"</a>. ProQuest. <a href="ProQuest" title="ProQuest">ProQuest</a>&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.proquest.com/docview/2321064595">2321064595</a>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-:03-27"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-:03_27-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:03_27-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFHerrington2002" class="citation book cs1">Herrington, Anne (2002). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/j.ctt46nxbc.25.pdf">"Gone Fishin'"</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>. <i>GONE FISHIN': Rendering and the Uses of Personal Experience in Writing</i>. University Press of Colorado. pp.&nbsp;<span class="nowrap">223–</span>238. <a href="Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.2307%2Fj.ctt46nxbc.25">10.2307/j.ctt46nxbc.25</a>. <a href="ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a>&nbsp;<bdi>978-0-87421-430-7</bdi>. <a href="JSTOR_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="JSTOR (identifier)">JSTOR</a>&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46nxbc.25">j.ctt46nxbc.25</a>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-Michaud-28"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-Michaud_28-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Michaud_28-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFMichaud2019" class="citation web cs1">Michaud, Michael (2019). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://compositionforum.com/issue/41/bruce-ballenger-interview.php">"Composing a Career, from Expressivism to Essayism: A Conversation with Bruce Ballenger"</a>. <i>Composition Forum</i>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-:3-29"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-:3_29-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:3_29-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFGoldblatt2017" class="citation book cs1">Goldblatt, Eli (2017). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.academia.edu/40384375/Don_t_Call_It_Expressivism_Legacies_of_a_Tacit_Tradition_"><i>Don't Call It Expressivism: Legacies of a "Tacit Tradition"</i></a>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-:4-30"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-:4_30-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:4_30-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:4_30-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFElbow1998" class="citation book cs1">Elbow, Eli (1998). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://talkcurriculum.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/elbow-p-1973-writing-without-teachers-pp-12e28093751.pdf"><i>Writing Without Teachers</i></a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-:5-31"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-:5_31-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:5_31-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFRule2014" class="citation book cs1">Rule, Hannah J. (2014). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/expressivism/rule.pdf"><i>REREADING ROMANTICISM,REREADING EXPRESSIVISM:REVISING “VOICE” THROUGH WORDSWORTH’S PREFACES</i></a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-:6-32"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-:6_32-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:6_32-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFMack2014" class="citation book cs1">Mack, Nancy (2014). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/expressivism/mack.pdf"><i>CRITICAL MEMOIR AND IDENTITY FORMATION: BEING, BELONGING, BECOMING</i></a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-:7-33"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-:7_33-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:7_33-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:7_33-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFScott" class="citation book cs1">Scott, Wagar. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/expressivism/wagar.pdf"><i>IS IT POSSIBLE TO TEACH WRITING SO THAT PEOPLE STOP KILLING EACH OTHER?” NONVIOLENCE, COMPOSITION, AND CRITICAL EXPRESSIVISM</i></a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-Rose,_Irene_2008-34"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-Rose,_Irene_2008_34-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Rose,_Irene_2008_34-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text">Rose, Irene. "Autistic Autobiography or Autistic Life Journal". <i>Journal of Literary Disability</i> 2.1 (2008): 44–54</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-Hacker-35"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Hacker_35-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">Hacker, Diana. (2009). A Writer's Reference (6th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin's. <a href="ISBN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISBN (identifier)">ISBN</a>&nbsp;<bdi>978-0-312-59332-2</bdi>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external autonumber" href="http://bcs.bedfordstmartins.com/writersref6e/Player/Pages/Main.aspx">[1]</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20100406231407/http://bcs.bedfordstmartins.com/writersref6e/Player/Pages/Main.aspx">Archived</a> 2010-04-06 at the <a href="Wayback_Machine" title="Wayback Machine">Wayback Machine</a></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-36"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-36">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFRoberts2009" class="citation news cs1">Roberts, Sam (2009-04-21). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/22/books/22elem.html">"'The Elements of Style' Turns 50"</a>. <i>The New York Times</i>. <a href="ISSN_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="ISSN (identifier)">ISSN</a>&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://search.worldcat.org/issn/0362-4331">0362-4331</a><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-07-27</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-37"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-37">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFPullum2010" class="citation journal cs1"><a href="Geoffrey_K._Pullum" title="Geoffrey K. Pullum">Pullum, Geoffrey K.</a> (June 2010). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/files/8520953/PULLUM_2010_The_land_of_the_free_and_the_elements_of_style.pdf">"The land of the free and <i>The Elements of Style</i>"</a> <span class="cs1-format">(PDF)</span>. <i><a href="English_Today" title="English Today">English Today</a></i>. <b>26</b> (2): <span class="nowrap">34–</span>44. <a href="Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.1017%2FS0266078410000076">10.1017/S0266078410000076</a>. <a href="Hdl_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Hdl (identifier)">hdl</a>:<span class="id-lock-free" title="Freely accessible"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11820%2Feb0c194a-4d95-4939-89cd-75eb83f083e3">20.500.11820/eb0c194a-4d95-4939-89cd-75eb83f083e3</a></span>. <a href="S2CID_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="S2CID (identifier)">S2CID</a>&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:145264789">145264789</a>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-38"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-38">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFPullum2009" class="citation journal cs1"><a href="Geoffrey_K._Pullum" title="Geoffrey K. Pullum">Pullum, Geoffrey K.</a> (17 April 2009). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.chronicle.com/article/50-Years-of-Stupid-Grammar/25497">"50 years of stupid grammar advice"</a>. <i><a href="The_Chronicle_of_Higher_Education" title="The Chronicle of Higher Education">The Chronicle of Higher Education</a></i>. <b>55</b> (32): <span class="nowrap">B15 –</span> <span class="nowrap">B16</span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-39"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-39">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">"General Writing". <a href="The_Purdue_Online_Writing_Lab" class="mw-redirect" title="The Purdue Online Writing Lab">The Purdue Online Writing Lab</a> (OWL). <a href="Purdue_University" title="Purdue University">Purdue University</a>, 2008. Web. Accessed on 26 December 2023. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/index.html">https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/index.html</a>.</span>
</li>
</ol></div></div>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="Further_reading">Further reading</h2></div>
<style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1290876196">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */


.mw-parser-output .side-box{margin:4px 0;box-sizing:border-box;border:1px solid #aaa;font-size:88%;line-height:1.25em;background-color:var(--background-color-interactive-subtle,#f8f9fa);display:flow-root}.mw-parser-output .infobox .side-box{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .side-box-abovebelow,.mw-parser-output .side-box-text{padding:0.25em 0.9em}.mw-parser-output .side-box-image{padding:2px 0 2px 0.9em;text-align:center}.mw-parser-output .side-box-imageright{padding:2px 0.9em 2px 0;text-align:center}@media(min-width:500px){.mw-parser-output .side-box-flex{display:flex;align-items:center}.mw-parser-output .side-box-text{flex:1;min-width:0}}@media(min-width:720px){.mw-parser-output .side-box{width:238px}.mw-parser-output .side-box-right{clear:right;float:right;margin-left:1em}.mw-parser-output .side-box-left{margin-right:1em}}


/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style>
<ul><li><a href="Ann_E._Berthoff" title="Ann E. Berthoff">Berthoff, Ann</a>. <i>The Making of Meaning: Metaphors, Models and Maxims for Writing Teachers</i>. Boynton/Cook Publishers, 1981.</li>
<li>Brand, Alice G. "The Why of Cognition: Emotion and the Writing Process". CCC 38.4 (1987): 436–443.</li>
<li><a href="Kenneth_Bruffee" title="Kenneth Bruffee">Bruffee, Kenneth A</a>. "Collaborative Learning and the 'Conversation of Mankind'" <i>College English</i> 46.7 (1984): 635–652.</li>
<li>Elbow, Peter. <i>Writing without Teachers</i> 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, USA, 1998.</li>
<li><cite id="CITEREFFlowerHayes1977" class="citation journal cs1">Flower, Linda S.; Hayes, John R. (December 1977). "Problem-Solving Strategies and the Writing Process". <i>College English</i>. <b>39</b> (4). National Council of Teachers of English: <span class="nowrap">449–</span>461. <a href="Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.2307%2F375768">10.2307/375768</a>. <a href="JSTOR_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="JSTOR (identifier)">JSTOR</a>&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/375768">375768</a>.</cite></li>
<li><cite id="CITEREFFlowerHayes1980" class="citation journal cs1">Flower, Linda; Hayes, John R. (February 1980). "The Cognition of Discovery: Defining a Rhetorical Problem". <i>College Composition and Communication</i>. <b>31</b> (1). National Council of Teachers of English: <span class="nowrap">21–</span>32. <a href="Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.2307%2F356630">10.2307/356630</a>. <a href="JSTOR_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="JSTOR (identifier)">JSTOR</a>&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/356630">356630</a>.</cite></li>
<li><cite class="citation journal cs1">Flower, Linda; Hayes, John R. (December 1981). "A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing". <i>College Composition and Communication</i>. <b>32</b> (4). National Council of Teachers of English: <span class="nowrap">365–</span>387. <a href="Doi_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="Doi (identifier)">doi</a>:<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://doi.org/10.2307%2F356600">10.2307/356600</a>. <a href="JSTOR_(identifier)" class="mw-redirect" title="JSTOR (identifier)">JSTOR</a>&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/356600">356600</a>.</cite></li>
<li>Guffey, Rhodes and Rogin. "Business Communication: Process and Product". Third Brief Canadian Edition. Thomson-Nelson, 2010.</li>
<li>Murray, Donald. <i>Writing to Learn</i> 8th ed. Wadsworth. 2004</li>
<li>Pattison, Darcy. <i>Paper Lightning: Prewriting Activities to Spark Creativity and Help Students Write Effectively</i>. Cottonwood Press, 2008.</li>
<li>Sommers, Nancy. "Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers". CCC 31.4 (1980): 378–388.</li>
<li><cite id="CITEREFTrimbur2009" class="citation book cs1">Trimbur, John (2009). "Consensus and Difference in Collaborative Learning". In Miller, Susan (ed.). <i>The Norton Book of Composition Studies</i>. W.W. Norton &amp; Company. pp.&nbsp;<span class="nowrap">733–</span>747.</cite></li>
<li><cite id="CITEREFWilliams2009" class="citation book cs1">Williams, Joseph M. (2009). "The Phenomenology of error". In Miller, Susan (ed.). <i>The Norton Book of Composition Studies</i>. W.W. Norton &amp; Company. pp.&nbsp;<span class="nowrap">414–</span>429.</cite></li></ul>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="External_links">External links</h2></div>
<style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1237033735">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */


@media print{body.ns-0 .mw-parser-output .sistersitebox{display:none!important}}@media screen{html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .sistersitebox img[src*="Wiktionary-logo-en-v2.svg"]{background-color:white}}@media screen and (prefers-color-scheme:dark){html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .sistersitebox img[src*="Wiktionary-logo-en-v2.svg"]{background-color:white}}


/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style><div class="side-box side-box-right sistersitebox">
<div class="side-box-flex">
<div class="side-box-image"><span class="noviewer" typeof="mw:File"></span></div>
<div class="side-box-text plainlist">Wikiversity has learning resources about <i><b><a href="https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Collaborative_play_writing" class="extiw external" title="v:Collaborative play writing">Collaborative play writing</a></b></i></div></div>
</div>
<ul><li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/index.html">Purdue Online Writing Lab</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlL_6x7dq-E&amp;t=1s">Power writing</a> Youtube video: Tips on saying loads with few words</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://cmsw.mit.edu/writing-and-communication-center/resources/writers/"><i>Resources for Writers</i>, from MIT's Online Writing and Communication Center</a></li></ul>
<div class="navbox-styles"><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1129693374">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */


.mw-parser-output .hlist dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul{margin:0;padding:0}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt,.mw-parser-output .hlist li{margin:0;display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ul{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist .mw-empty-li{display:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dt::after{content:": "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li::after{content:" · ";font-weight:bold}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li:last-child::after{content:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:first-child::before{content:" (";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:last-child::after{content:")";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol{counter-reset:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li{counter-increment:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li::before{content:" "counter(listitem)"\a0 "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li ol>li:first-child::before{content:" ("counter(listitem)"\a0 "}


/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1236075235">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */


.mw-parser-output .navbox{box-sizing:border-box;border:1px solid #a2a9b1;width:100%;clear:both;font-size:88%;text-align:center;padding:1px;margin:1em auto 0}.mw-parser-output .navbox .navbox{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .navbox+.navbox,.mw-parser-output .navbox+.navbox-styles+.navbox{margin-top:-1px}.mw-parser-output .navbox-inner,.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup{width:100%}.mw-parser-output .navbox-group,.mw-parser-output .navbox-title,.mw-parser-output .navbox-abovebelow{padding:0.25em 1em;line-height:1.5em;text-align:center}.mw-parser-output .navbox-group{white-space:nowrap;text-align:right}.mw-parser-output .navbox,.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup{background-color:#fdfdfd}.mw-parser-output .navbox-list{line-height:1.5em;border-color:#fdfdfd}.mw-parser-output .navbox-list-with-group{text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid}.mw-parser-output tr+tr>.navbox-abovebelow,.mw-parser-output tr+tr>.navbox-group,.mw-parser-output tr+tr>.navbox-image,.mw-parser-output tr+tr>.navbox-list{border-top:2px solid #fdfdfd}.mw-parser-output .navbox-title{background-color:#ccf}.mw-parser-output .navbox-abovebelow,.mw-parser-output .navbox-group,.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup .navbox-title{background-color:#ddf}.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup .navbox-group,.mw-parser-output .navbox-subgroup .navbox-abovebelow{background-color:#e6e6ff}.mw-parser-output .navbox-even{background-color:#f7f7f7}.mw-parser-output .navbox-odd{background-color:transparent}.mw-parser-output .navbox .hlist td dl,.mw-parser-output .navbox .hlist td ol,.mw-parser-output .navbox .hlist td ul,.mw-parser-output .navbox td.hlist dl,.mw-parser-output .navbox td.hlist ol,.mw-parser-output .navbox td.hlist ul{padding:0.125em 0}.mw-parser-output .navbox .navbar{display:block;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .navbox-title .navbar{float:left;text-align:left;margin-right:0.5em}body.skin--responsive .mw-parser-output .navbox-image img{max-width:none!important}@media print{body.ns-0 .mw-parser-output .navbox{display:none!important}}


/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style></div><div role="navigation" class="navbox" aria-labelledby="Literary_composition158" style="padding:3px"><table class="nowraplinks mw-collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner" style="border-spacing:0;background:transparent;color:inherit"><tbody><tr><th scope="col" class="navbox-title" colspan="2"><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1239400231">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */


.mw-parser-output .navbar{display:inline;font-size:88%;font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .navbar-collapse{float:left;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .navbar-boxtext{word-spacing:0}.mw-parser-output .navbar ul{display:inline-block;white-space:nowrap;line-height:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::before{margin-right:-0.125em;content:"[ "}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::after{margin-left:-0.125em;content:" ]"}.mw-parser-output .navbar li{word-spacing:-0.125em}.mw-parser-output .navbar a>span,.mw-parser-output .navbar a>abbr{text-decoration:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-mini abbr{font-variant:small-caps;border-bottom:none;text-decoration:none;cursor:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-full{font-size:114%;margin:0 7em}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-mini{font-size:114%;margin:0 4em}html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .navbar li a abbr{color:var(--color-base)!important}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .navbar li a abbr{color:var(--color-base)!important}}@media print{.mw-parser-output .navbar{display:none!important}}


/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style><div id="Literary_composition158" style="font-size:114%;margin:0 4em"><a href="Composition_(language)" title="Composition (language)">Literary composition</a></div></th></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">General topics</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em">
<ul><li><a href="Characterization" title="Characterization">Characterization</a></li>
<li><a href="Description" title="Description">Description</a></li>
<li><a href="Exposition_(narrative)" title="Exposition (narrative)">Exposition</a></li>
<li><a href="Fiction_writing" title="Fiction writing">Fiction writing</a></li>
<li><a href="Literature" title="Literature">Literature</a></li>
<li><a href="Writer" title="Writer">Writer</a></li>
<li><a href="Writer's_block" title="Writer's block">Writer's block</a></li></ul>
</div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%"><a href="List_of_narrative_techniques" title="List of narrative techniques">Techniques</a>&nbsp;/ devices</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em">
<ul><li><a href="Contrast_(linguistics)" title="Contrast (linguistics)">Linguistic contrast</a></li>
<li><a href="Contrast_(literary)" title="Contrast (literary)">Literary contrast</a></li>
<li><a href="Clich%C3%A9" title="Cliché">Cliché</a></li>
<li><a href="Idiom" title="Idiom">Idiom</a></li>
<li><a href="Trope_(literature)" title="Trope (literature)">Trope</a></li></ul>
</div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">Methods</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em">
<ul><li>
<ul><li><a href="Prewriting" title="Prewriting">Prewriting</a></li></ul></li>
<li><a href="Assemblage_(composition)" title="Assemblage (composition)">Assemblage</a></li>
<li><a href="Cut-up_technique" title="Cut-up technique">Cut-up technique</a></li>
<li><a href="Diegesis" title="Diegesis">Diegesis</a></li>
<li><a href="Mimesis" title="Mimesis">Mimesis</a></li>
<li><a href="Pastiche" title="Pastiche">Pastiche</a></li>
<li><a href="Plagiarism" title="Plagiarism">Plagiarism</a></li></ul>
</div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">Features</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em">
<ul><li><a href="Writing_style" title="Writing style">Writing style</a></li>
<li><a href="Writer's_voice" class="mw-redirect" title="Writer's voice">Writer's voice</a></li>
<li><a href="Grammatical_mood" title="Grammatical mood">Grammatical mood</a></li>
<li><a href="Register_(sociolinguistics)" title="Register (sociolinguistics)">Register</a></li>
<li><a href="Rhetorical_modes" title="Rhetorical modes">Rhetorical modes</a></li>
<li><a href="Stylistics" title="Stylistics">Stylistics</a></li>
<li><a href="Tone_(literature)" title="Tone (literature)">Tone</a></li></ul>
</div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">Forms</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-odd hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em">
<ul><li><a href="Creative_nonfiction" title="Creative nonfiction">Creative nonfiction</a></li>
<li><a href="Essay" title="Essay">Essay</a></li>
<li><a href="Joke" title="Joke">Joke</a></li>
<li><a href="Novel" title="Novel">Novel</a></li>
<li><a href="Poetry" title="Poetry">Poetry</a></li>
<li><a href="Screenplay" title="Screenplay">Screenplay</a></li>
<li><a href="Short_story" title="Short story">Short story</a></li></ul>
</div></td></tr><tr><th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style="width:1%">Beyond the arts</th><td class="navbox-list-with-group navbox-list navbox-even hlist" style="width:100%;padding:0"><div style="padding:0 0.25em">
<ul><li><a href="Articulation_(sociology)" title="Articulation (sociology)">Articulation (sociological)</a></li>
<li><a href="Composition_studies" title="Composition studies">Composition studies</a></li>
<li><a href="Technical_writing" title="Technical writing">Technical writing</a></li></ul>
</div></td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><!--htdig_noindex--><div><div class="zim-footer">
This article is issued from <a class="external text" title="Last edited on 2025-08-02" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/?title=Writing_process&amp;oldid=1303896603">Wikipedia</a>. The text is available under <a class="external text" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en">Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0</a> unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.
</div>
</div><!--/htdig_noindex--></div>
</div>
</main>
</div>
</div>
</div>

</body></html>